[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimZA1Npf0nJ8PF-2=8Oe2LXr_ShyBJNkf8Dn5S5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 13:10:19 -0800
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: GCC Development <gcc@....gnu.org>,
GNU C Library <libc-alpha@...rceware.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x32-abi@...glegroups.com,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: X32 psABI status
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Saturday 12 February 2011 20:41:01 H.J. Lu wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We made lots of progresses on x32 pABI:
>>
>> https://sites.google.com/site/x32abi/
>>
>> 1. Kernel interface with syscall is close to be finalized.
>
> Really? I haven't seen this being posted for review yet ;-)
>
> The basic concept looks entirely reasonable to me, but I'm
> curious what drove the decision to start out with the x86_64
> system calls instead of the generic ones.
>
> Since tile was merged, we now have support for compat syscalls
> in the generic syscall ABI. I would have assumed that it
> was possible to just use those if you decide to do a new
> ABI in the first place.
>
> The other option that would have appeared natural to me is
> to just use the existing 32 bit compat ABI with the few
> necessary changes done based on the personality.
>
If you are interested, please check out the x32 kernel to
take a look and provide feedback.
Thanks.
--
H.J.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists