[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110214123244.GA4586@swordfish.minsk.epam.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 14:32:44 +0200
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix section mismatch in reference from
native_play_dead
Hello,
On (02/14/11 13:25), Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > Fix
> >
> > WARNING: arch/x86/kernel/built-in.o(.text+0x19cde): Section mismatch in reference from
> > the function native_play_dead() to the function .cpuinit.text:mwait_usable()
> > The function native_play_dead() references the function __cpuinit mwait_usable().
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 2 +-
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> > index 0cbe8c0..0b8c6c9 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> > @@ -1467,7 +1467,7 @@ static inline void hlt_play_dead(void)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > -void native_play_dead(void)
> > +void __cpuinit native_play_dead(void)
> > {
> > play_dead_common();
> > tboot_shutdown(TB_SHUTDOWN_WFS);
>
> I think the right fix is Boris's fix below. Agreed?
>
[..]
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h
> index 6e6e755..4564c8e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h
> @@ -32,6 +32,6 @@ extern void arch_unregister_cpu(int);
>
> DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, cpu_state);
>
> -int __cpuinit mwait_usable(const struct cpuinfo_x86 *);
> +int mwait_usable(const struct cpuinfo_x86 *);
>
> #endif /* _ASM_X86_CPU_H */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> index e764fc0..3c189e9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> @@ -506,7 +506,7 @@ static void poll_idle(void)
> #define MWAIT_ECX_EXTENDED_INFO 0x01
> #define MWAIT_EDX_C1 0xf0
>
> -int __cpuinit mwait_usable(const struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> +int mwait_usable(const struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> {
> u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
>
>
`int mwait_usable(..)' is called from `void __cpuinit select_idle_routine(...)'
I think we still have section mismatch in this case. Is it correct?
Sergey
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists