[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110215094327.GA1387@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:43:27 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, brgerst@...il.com, gorcunov@...il.com,
shaohui.zheng@...el.com, rientjes@...gle.com, hpa@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/26] x86-64, NUMA: Unify the rest of memblk registration
* Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:35:06AM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > On 02/14/2011 11:30 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:07:02AM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > >> Never mind. will send out patch after your patches get merged into tip.
> > >
> > > Alright, fair enough.
> > >
> > >> BTW, you may need to rebase your on top of tip/master.
> > >
> > > Yeah, I saw a new patch going into the numa branch, but shouldn't this
> > > and the next series based on x86/numa? That was how it was done with
> > > the previous series.
> >
> > there is patch about init_memory_mapping_high() in tip/x86/bootmem.
> > it will put pgtable on local nodes.
>
> Ingo, hpa, how do you guys want to handle this? Maybe you can cherry
> pick or pull the branch into x86/numa?
Would be nice to have a version against the latest tip:x86/numa tree, the current
one conflicts in arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c with your tree. Also, i suspect you want to
propagate Yinghai's Acked-by's into the commits?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists