[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110215164920.GR3160@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 17:49:20 +0100
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, brgerst@...il.com, gorcunov@...il.com,
shaohui.zheng@...el.com, rientjes@...gle.com, hpa@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/26] x86-64, NUMA: Unify the rest of memblk
registration
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:43:27AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Would be nice to have a version against the latest tip:x86/numa
> tree, the current one conflicts in arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c with your
> tree. Also, i suspect you want to propagate Yinghai's Acked-by's
> into the commits?
Acked-by added and rebased on top of the current x86/numa. Only one
patch needed to be updated and the udpated version was just posted.
The updated git branches are available at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/misc.git x86_64-numa-unify
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/misc.git x86_64-numa-emu-unify
The latter one is superset of the former.
If you want the whole series reposted, please let me know.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists