[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110215105755.GC21311@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 05:57:55 -0500
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
james_p_freyensee@...ux.intel.com, gregkh@...e.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, suhail.ahmed@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] export kernel call get_task_comm()
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 08:36:02PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> Which is a detail you really don't want to leak out of the proper
> abstraction use. I really don't see why you are advocating bad
> programming practice - everything else uses the abstraction properly,
> this just happens to be the first modular case that wants to behave
> properly.
Just grep for current->comm uses and get_task_comm uses and see that
this is not true.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists