[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1297731276.2394.19.camel@localhost>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 19:54:36 -0500
From: Andy Walls <awalls@...metrocast.net>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
stoth@...nellabs.com
Subject: Re: cx23885-input.c does in fact use a workqueue....
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 12:03 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 08:33:55PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > The cx23885 driver does in fact schedule work for IR input handling:
> > >
> > > Here's where it is scheduled for CX23888 chips:
> > >
> > > http://git.linuxtv.org/media_tree.git?a=blob;f=drivers/media/video/cx23885/cx23885-ir.c;h=7125247dd25558678c823ee3262675570c9aa630;hb=HEAD#l76
> > >
> > > Here's where it is scheduled for CX23885 chips:
> > >
> > > http://git.linuxtv.org/media_tree.git?a=blob;f=drivers/media/video/cx23885/cx23885-core.c;h=359882419b7f588b7c698dbcfb6a39ddb1603301;hb=HEAD#l1861
>
> Ah, sorry about missing those.
There's a lot of indirection in drivers under drivers/media/video so it
doesn't surprise me when someone misses something.
(BTW, I only checked cx23885 since I wrote the IR handling and added the
work queue usage for IR that driver.)
> > > So what should be done about the flush_scheduled_work()? I think it
> > > belongs there.
> > >
> >
> > Convert to using threaded irq?
Too big of a regression testing job for me to take on at the moment.
> Or
>
> 1. Just flush the work items explicitly using flush_work_sync().
That will do for now.
> 2. Create a dedicated workqueue to serve as flushing domain.
I have gotten reports of the IR Rx FIFO overflows for the CX23885 IR Rx
unit (the I2C connected one). I eventually should either set the Rx
FIFO service interrupt watermark down from 4 measurments to 1
measurment, or use a kthread_worker with some higher priority to respond
to the IR Rx FIFO service interrupt.
> The first would look like the following. Does this look correct?
Yes, your patch below looks sane to me.
Reviewed-by: Andy Walls <awalls@...metrocast.net>
Thanks,
Andy
> Thanks.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/video/cx23885/cx23885-input.c b/drivers/media/video/cx23885/cx23885-input.c
> index 199b996..e27cedb 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/video/cx23885/cx23885-input.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/video/cx23885/cx23885-input.c
> @@ -229,6 +229,9 @@ static void cx23885_input_ir_stop(struct cx23885_dev *dev)
> v4l2_subdev_call(dev->sd_ir, ir, rx_s_parameters, ¶ms);
> v4l2_subdev_call(dev->sd_ir, ir, rx_g_parameters, ¶ms);
> }
> + flush_work_sync(&dev->cx25840_work);
> + flush_work_sync(&dev->ir_rx_work);
> + flush_work_sync(&dev->ir_tx_work);
> }
>
> static void cx23885_input_ir_close(struct rc_dev *rc)
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists