[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110216001435.199181831@clark.kroah.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 16:12:38 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc: stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: [101/272] tracing: Fix preempt count leak
2.6.37-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
commit 1dbd1951f39e13da579ffe879cce19586d0462de upstream.
While running my ftrace stress test, this showed up:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/mmap.c:233
...
note: cat[3293] exited with preempt_count 1
The bug was introduced by commit 91e86e560d0b3ce4c5fc64fd2bbb99f856a30a4e
("tracing: Fix recursive user stack trace")
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
LKML-Reference: <4D0089AC.1020802@...fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
kernel/trace/trace.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -1313,12 +1313,10 @@ ftrace_trace_userstack(struct ring_buffe
__this_cpu_inc(user_stack_count);
-
-
event = trace_buffer_lock_reserve(buffer, TRACE_USER_STACK,
sizeof(*entry), flags, pc);
if (!event)
- return;
+ goto out_drop_count;
entry = ring_buffer_event_data(event);
entry->tgid = current->tgid;
@@ -1333,8 +1331,8 @@ ftrace_trace_userstack(struct ring_buffe
if (!filter_check_discard(call, entry, buffer, event))
ring_buffer_unlock_commit(buffer, event);
+ out_drop_count:
__this_cpu_dec(user_stack_count);
-
out:
preempt_enable();
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists