[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110217135956.GA8053@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:59:56 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: use bitmap library functions
* Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com> wrote:
> 2011/2/17 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>:
> >
> > * Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Use bitmap_set()/bitmap_clear() to fill/zero a region of a bitmap
> >> instead of doing set_bit()/clear_bit() each bit.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
> >> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> >> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> >> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
> >> Cc: x86@...nel.org
> >> ---
> >> arch/x86/kernel/ioport.c | 20 +++++---------------
> >> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
> > Before we can merge this it would be nice to tested this using sys_ioperm(), to make
> > sure port IO still gets denied/allowed as expected. You can check /proc/ioperm to
> > see which ports are (probably) safe to read: 0x80/0xed is usually safe to
> > read/write.
>
> I have tested with this program and there is no difference in behavior
> with this patch.
Great - i've queued it up in tip:x86/asm.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists