[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=eS=mdRQ07EvceP0098_=kj96qRNYeQ0oAduo-@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:00:01 +0900
From: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: use bitmap library functions
2011/2/17 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>:
>
> * Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> Use bitmap_set()/bitmap_clear() to fill/zero a region of a bitmap
>> instead of doing set_bit()/clear_bit() each bit.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
>> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
>> Cc: x86@...nel.org
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kernel/ioport.c | 20 +++++---------------
>> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> Before we can merge this it would be nice to tested this using sys_ioperm(), to make
> sure port IO still gets denied/allowed as expected. You can check /proc/ioperm to
> see which ports are (probably) safe to read: 0x80/0xed is usually safe to
> read/write.
I have tested with this program and there is no difference in behavior
with this patch.
#include <sys/io.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <err.h>
int main(void)
{
unsigned long from = 0xed;
unsigned long num = 1;
int ret;
int i;
ret = ioperm(from, num, 1);
if (ret)
err(1, "ioperm");
for (i = 0; i < num; i++)
ret = inb(from + i);
printf("OK\n");
ret = ioperm(from, num, 0);
if (ret)
err(1, "ioperm");
printf("will receive a segmentation fault\n");
ret = inb(from);
errx(1, "Oops");
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists