linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] module: deal with alignment issues in built-in module versions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTim_BL_Cw=X0iuatgw1F4n50CyXv0uqx9n=5=Bq+@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 17 Feb 2011 09:24:58 -0800
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...are.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	"Linux/m68k" <linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] module: deal with alignment issues in built-in module versions

On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...are.com> wrote:
>
> Moreover, as DaveM said, we can't reliably put structures into
> independent objects, put them into a special section, and then expect
> array access over them (via the section boundaries) after linking the
> objects together to just "work" due to variable alignment choices in
> different situations.

Why not?

That's what we normally do. Just align the "__modver", and you should
be all good. What's the problem?

                     Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/