[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1297981754.11705.9.camel@calx>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:29:14 -0600
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
To: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] random: update interface comments to reflect reality
On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 17:23 -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> At present, the comment header in random.c makes no mention of
> add_disk_randomness, and instead, suggests that disk activity adds to the
> random pool by way of add_interrupt_randomness, which appears to not have
> been the case since sometime prior to the existence of git, and even prior
> to bitkeeper. Didn't look any further back. At least, as far as I can
> tell, there are no storage drivers setting IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM, which is a
> requirement for add_interrupt_randomness to trigger, so the only way for a
> disk to contribute entropy is by way of add_disk_randomness. Update
> comments accordingly, complete with special mention about solid state
> drives being a crappy source of entropy (see e2e1a148bc for reference).
>
> Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
Sure. Herbert, let's route this through your crypto tree.
Acked-by: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
> ---
> drivers/char/random.c | 13 ++++++++++---
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/random.c b/drivers/char/random.c
> index 908ac1f..3dba627 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/random.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/random.c
> @@ -128,6 +128,7 @@
> * void add_input_randomness(unsigned int type, unsigned int code,
> * unsigned int value);
> * void add_interrupt_randomness(int irq);
> + * void add_disk_randomness(struct gendisk *disk);
> *
> * add_input_randomness() uses the input layer interrupt timing, as well as
> * the event type information from the hardware.
> @@ -136,9 +137,15 @@
> * inputs to the entropy pool. Note that not all interrupts are good
> * sources of randomness! For example, the timer interrupts is not a
> * good choice, because the periodicity of the interrupts is too
> - * regular, and hence predictable to an attacker. Disk interrupts are
> - * a better measure, since the timing of the disk interrupts are more
> - * unpredictable.
> + * regular, and hence predictable to an attacker. Network Interface
> + * Controller interrupts are a better measure, since the timing of the
> + * NIC interrupts are more unpredictable.
> + *
> + * add_disk_randomness() uses what amounts to the seek time of block
> + * layer request events, on a per-disk_devt basis, as input to the
> + * entropy pool. Note that high-speed solid state drives with very low
> + * seek times do not make for good sources of entropy, as their seek
> + * times are usually fairly consistent.
> *
> * All of these routines try to estimate how many bits of randomness a
> * particular randomness source. They do this by keeping track of the
>
>
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists