[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D5E9016.4070808@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:28:22 -0700
From: David Ahern <daahern@...co.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...e.hu, acme@...stprotocols.net, paulus@...ba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf events: fix WARN_ON_ONCE for 64-bit raw data,
SW events
On 02/18/11 07:55, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> Another gotcha is in perf_output_sample there is:
>> struct {
>> u32 size;
>> u32 data;
>> } raw = {
>> .size = sizeof(u32),
>> .data = 0,
>> };
>>
>> While that meets the 8-byte stride I was concerned that changing the
>> size field to u64 breaks ABI.
>
> It would.
>
> No, what you need to do is provide data that is sized such that it
> matches the 8b stride adding padding where needed.
I want to push a 64-bit counter to userspace. By definition it meets the
8-byte stride. Now how do I get sizeof(size field) + sizeof(data) to
meet an 8-byte stride? I can't when sizeof(size field) = 4. Ok, I can
pad the data with 4 bytes, but then I an api to tell the user to strip
the 4-byte pad. Seems like an odd way to go.
Why is an 8-byte stride preferred over a 4-bytes?
David
>
> Anyway, I don't think you need RAW at all.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists