[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D610B3A.5070705@mvista.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 15:38:18 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...sta.com>
To: "Anoop P.A" <anoop.pa@...il.com>
CC: ralf@...ux-mips.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make msp7120_reset generic
Hello.
On 18-02-2011 16:55, Anoop P.A wrote:
> From: Anoop P A<anoop.pa@...il.com>
> Remove platform dependency code from msp7120 reset code and make it generic.
> Now the code can be reused for other boards running msp71xx family SoC.
> Signed-off-by: Anoop P A<anoop.pa@...il.com>
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/mips/pmc-sierra/msp71xx/msp_setup.c b/arch/mips/pmc-sierra/msp71xx/msp_setup.c
> index fb37a10..4a6cc0d 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/pmc-sierra/msp71xx/msp_setup.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/pmc-sierra/msp71xx/msp_setup.c
> @@ -18,30 +18,33 @@
>
> #include<msp_prom.h>
> #include<msp_regs.h>
> +#include<msp_gpio_macros.h>
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_PMC_MSP7120_GW)
> -#include<msp_regops.h>
> + /* GPIO 9 is the 4th GPIO of register 3
> + */
Not clear why you're using a multi-line comment where a single-one line
one (and not indented) would be enough?
> @@ -78,49 +81,56 @@ void msp7120_reset(void)
> /* Wait a bit for the DDRC to settle */
> for (i = 0; i < 100000000; i++);
>
> -#if defined(CONFIG_PMC_MSP7120_GW)
> +#if defined MSP_BOARD_RESET_GPIO
Hm, didn't know that the 'defined' syntax without parens is valid too...
> @@ -141,9 +151,7 @@ void msp_power_off(void)
>
> void __init plat_mem_setup(void)
> {
> - _machine_restart = msp_restart;
> - _machine_halt = msp_halt;
> - pm_power_off = msp_power_off;
> +/*TODO: Move mem setup here */
This line should be indented.
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists