[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1102211409480.2701@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 14:18:04 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] debugobjects: print more data
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/debugobjects.h b/include/linux/debugobjects.h
> index 597692f..c22eebf 100644
> --- a/include/linux/debugobjects.h
> +++ b/include/linux/debugobjects.h
> @@ -31,10 +31,11 @@ struct debug_obj {
> void *object;
> struct debug_obj_descr *descr;
> };
> -
Stray whitespace change
> /**
> * struct debug_obj_descr - object type specific debug description structure
> + *
> * @name: name of the object typee
> + * @print: function printing extra debug data
> * @fixup_init: fixup function, which is called when the init check
> * fails
> * @fixup_activate: fixup function, which is called when the activate check
> @@ -46,7 +47,7 @@ struct debug_obj {
> */
> struct debug_obj_descr {
> const char *name;
> -
> + void (*print) (struct debug_obj *obj);
> int (*fixup_init) (void *addr, enum debug_obj_state state);
> int (*fixup_activate) (void *addr, enum debug_obj_state state);
> int (*fixup_destroy) (void *addr, enum debug_obj_state state);
> @@ -73,6 +74,8 @@ debug_object_active_state(void *addr, struct debug_obj_descr *descr,
>
> extern void debug_objects_early_init(void);
> extern void debug_objects_mem_init(void);
> +
> +extern char *debug_func_str(void *func_addr);
Uuurgh.
> +void hrtimer_debug_print(struct debug_obj *obj)
> +{
> + struct hrtimer *hrtimer = obj->object;
> +
> + if (hrtimer == NULL)
> + return;
Why should obj->object be NULL. Also why not having the same calling
convention as all other functions (void *addr) ?
> +
> + printk(KERN_ERR "ODEBUG hrtimer: %p function: [<%p>] %s\n",
> + hrtimer, hrtimer->function, debug_func_str(hrtimer->function));
Why do you want to invent a new function for printing the symbol? %ps perhaps?
> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> index 2b97418..1e901b0 100644
> --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> @@ -276,6 +276,7 @@ config TIMER_STATS
> config DEBUG_OBJECTS
> bool "Debug object operations"
> depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
> + select KALLSYMS
No, we don't want to have DEBUG_OBJECTS tied to KALLSYMS.
> +char *debug_func_str(void *func_addr)
> +{
> + static char func_str[KSYM_SYMBOL_LEN];
> + sprint_symbol(func_str, (unsigned long) func_addr);
> +
> + return func_str;
> +}
See above.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists