[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110221140811.GH23087@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 16:08:11 +0200
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To: David Cohen <dacohen@...il.com>
Cc: balbi@...com, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, peterz@...radead.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] headers: fix circular dependency between
linux/sched.h and linux/wait.h
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 04:05:14PM +0200, David Cohen wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 03:51:25PM +0200, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> >> > I rather have the split done and kill the circular dependency.
> >>
> >> It's not circular for starters.
> >
> > how come ? wait.h depends on sched and sched.h depends on wait.h
>
> The tricky thing is wait.h doesn't depend on sched.h, but the file
> which uses wake_up*() macro defined on wait.h will depend on sched.h
> (what is still bad). wait.h should provide all dependencies to use a
That's why I say wait.h depends on sched.h because it uses a macro
defined in sched.h
--
balbi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists