linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] memcg: remove unnecessary BUG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTintsg+5wm7EOr40zUqcmhO3Qend=KeYV09zeOAE@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 21 Feb 2011 23:14:40 +0900
From:	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
To:	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] memcg: remove unnecessary BUG_ON

On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 12:17:17AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
>> Now memcg in unmap_and_move checks BUG_ON of charge.
>> But mem_cgroup_prepare_migration returns either 0 or -ENOMEM.
>> If it returns -ENOMEM, it jumps out unlock without the check.
>> If it returns 0, it can pass BUG_ON. So it's meaningless.
>> Let's remove it.
>>
>> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
>> Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Acked-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
>> Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
>> ---
>>  mm/migrate.c |    1 -
>>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
>> index eb083a6..2abc9c9 100644
>> --- a/mm/migrate.c
>> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
>> @@ -683,7 +683,6 @@ static int unmap_and_move(new_page_t get_new_page, unsigned long private,
>>               rc = -ENOMEM;
>>               goto unlock;
>>       }
>> -     BUG_ON(charge);
>
> You remove this assertion of the mem_cgroup_prepare_migration() return
> value but only add a comment about the expectations in the next patch.
>
> Could you write a full-blown kerneldoc on mem_cgroup_prepare_migration
> and remove this BUG_ON() in the same patch?
>

Okay. I could.




-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/