[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110222100235.GA15652@csn.ul.ie>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:02:36 +0000
From: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
To: Petr Holasek <pholasek@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hugetlbfs: correct handling of negative input to
/proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 04:47:49PM +0100, Petr Holasek wrote:
> When user insert negative value into /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages it will result
> in the setting a random number of HugePages in system (can be easily showed
> at /proc/meminfo output).
I bet you a shiny penny that the value of HugePages becomes the maximum
number that could be allocated by the system at the time rather than a
random value.
> This patch fixes the wrong behavior so that the
> negative input will result in nr_hugepages value unchanged.
>
As pointed out elsewhere, nr_overcommit_hugepages also needs fixing but
the fix is essentially the same.
> Signed-off-by: Petr Holasek <pholasek@...hat.com>
> ---
> mm/hugetlb.c | 3 +--
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index bb0b7c1..f99d7a8 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -1872,8 +1872,7 @@ static int hugetlb_sysctl_handler_common(bool obey_mempolicy,
> unsigned long tmp;
> int ret;
>
> - if (!write)
> - tmp = h->max_huge_pages;
> + tmp = h->max_huge_pages;
>
> if (write && h->order >= MAX_ORDER)
> return -EINVAL;
> --
> 1.7.1
>
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists