linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] hugetlbfs: correct handling of negative input to /proc/sys/vm/nr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 23 Feb 2011 16:18:18 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Cc:	Petr Holasek <pholasek@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hugetlbfs: correct handling of negative input to
 /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:02:36 +0000
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie> wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 04:47:49PM +0100, Petr Holasek wrote:
> > When user insert negative value into /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages it will result
> > in the setting a random number of HugePages in system (can be easily showed
> > at /proc/meminfo output).
> 
> I bet you a shiny penny that the value of HugePages becomes the maximum
> number that could be allocated by the system at the time rather than a
> random value.

That seems to be the case from my reading.  In which case the patch
removes probably-undocumented and possibly-useful existing behavior.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/