[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1298468706.7666.78.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 08:45:06 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>, hpa@...or.com,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de,
andi@...stfloor.org, roland@...hat.com, rth@...hat.com,
masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
avi@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net, sam@...nborg.org,
ddaney@...iumnetworks.com, michael@...erman.id.au,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] jump label: introduce static_branch() interface
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 11:11 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 17:28 -0500, Jason Baron wrote:
> > @@ -33,7 +28,11 @@ struct _ddebug {
> > #define _DPRINTK_FLAGS_PRINT (1<<0) /* printk() a message using
> > the format */
> > #define _DPRINTK_FLAGS_DEFAULT 0
> > unsigned int flags:8;
> > - char enabled;
> > +#ifdef HAVE_JUMP_LABEL
> > + struct jump_label_key enabled;
> > +#else
> > + int enabled;
> > +#endif
> > } __attribute__((aligned(8)));
> >
>
> Also, didn't you promise Mathieu a comment explaining why dynamic debug
> does funny things like this? :-) I mean we all know its because of the
> cyclic header stuff involving atomic etc.. but I'm also quite sure we'll
> all have forgotten about that in a few weeks time.
Case in point.... I already forgot about that ;-)
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists