[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110224121339.GE23042@quack.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 13:13:39 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: "Alex,Shi" <alex.shi@...el.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, "Li, Shaohua" <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@...il.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
"tytso@....edu" <tytso@....edu>,
"jaxboe@...ionio.com" <jaxboe@...ionio.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Chen, Tim C" <tim.c.chen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [performance bug] kernel building regression on 64 LCPUs
machine
On Wed 23-02-11 16:24:47, Alex,Shi wrote:
> Though these patches can not totally recovered the problem, but they are
> quite helpful with ccache enabled situation. It increase 10% performance
> on 38-rc1 kernel.
OK and what was the original performance drop with WRITE_SYNC change?
> I have tried to enabled they to latest rc6 kernel but failed. the vmstat output is here:
> with patches:
I'm attaching patches rebased on top of latest Linus's tree.
Corrado, could you possibly run your fsync-heavy tests so that we see
whether there isn't negative impact of my patches on your fsync-heavy
workload? Thanks.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
View attachment "0001-jbd2-Refine-commit-writeout-logic.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (10946 bytes)
View attachment "0002-jbd-Refine-commit-writeout-logic.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (9844 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists