linux-kernel - Re: [performance bug] kernel building regression on 64 LCPUs machine

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4D66FB76.7040701@intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 25 Feb 2011 08:44:38 +0800
From:	Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
To:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
CC:	"Li, Shaohua" <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
	Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@...il.com>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
	"tytso@....edu" <tytso@....edu>,
	"jaxboe@...ionio.com" <jaxboe@...ionio.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Chen, Tim C" <tim.c.chen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [performance bug] kernel building regression on 64 LCPUs machine

Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 23-02-11 16:24:47, Alex,Shi wrote:
>   
>> Though these patches can not totally recovered the problem, but they are
>> quite helpful with ccache enabled situation. It increase 10% performance
>> on 38-rc1 kernel. 
>>     
>   OK and what was the original performance drop with WRITE_SYNC change?
>   
The original drop is 30%.
>   
>> I have tried to enabled they to latest rc6 kernel but failed. the vmstat output is here: 
>> with patches:
>>     
>   I'm attaching patches rebased on top of latest Linus's tree. 
> Corrado, could you possibly run your fsync-heavy tests so that we see
> whether there isn't negative impact of my patches on your fsync-heavy
> workload? Thanks.
>
> 								Honza
>   

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/