[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D66AFDB.5010005@ru.mvista.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 22:22:03 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...sta.com>
To: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...sta.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/3] xhci: Fix cycle bit calculation during stall handling.
Hello.
Sarah Sharp wrote:
>>> + if (ep_ring->first_seg == ep_ring->first_seg->next&&
>>> + state->new_deq_ptr < dev->eps[ep_index].stopped_trb)
>>> + state->new_cycle_state ^= 0x1;
>> The last line seems overindented.
> Hi Sergei,
> checkpatch.pl doesn't complain about it. It is not a good use of my
> time to respin this patch for one stylistic change that is not a
> violation of the Kernel community norms.
> I really feel strongly that you are wasting the community's time by
> commenting on style when it is only a violation of your personal style,
> without providing any useful feedback on the code itself.
Not only of my personal style, as Dmitry's comment has shown. Like him, I
had some trouble seeing where the *if* expression ends and the branch starts,
due to both lines starting on the same level of indentation...
> I feel so strongly that I'm seriously considering setting up a feedback
> bot for you. It would run any patch you reply to through checkpatch.pl,
> and send you a small reminder when the patch passes, but you complained
> about style. I think it would allow you to have a sense of how
> frustrating it is to receive these unnecessary stylistic comments.
Well, I'll try to save you that trouble and avoid commenting on your patches
in the future.
> Sarah Sharp
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists