[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <C0CEB11E-CD60-4A10-BFC8-7CB555D1413C@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 23:10:15 -0800
From: Justin Mattock <justinmattock@...il.com>
To: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>
Cc: trivial@...nel.org, johannes@...solutions.net, davem@...emloft.net,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/21]include:net:mac80211.h remove one to many l's in the word.
On Feb 24, 2011, at 10:20 PM, Julian Calaby wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 17:15, Justin P. Mattock
> <justinmattock@...il.com> wrote:
>> The patch below removes an extra "l" in the word.
>
> Random thought:
>
> Not that I'm complaining about your work here, and not that commits
> are a finite resource, but would it be possible for you to collect
> your spelling changes into slightly bigger commits before sending them
> off?
>
> E.g. instead of sending off 21 patches to remove 21 erroneous l's, why
> not do a full spelling check on these 21 files, then send off 21
> patches to fix *all* the spelling mistakes in each file? You could
> even group them up by directory if you liked.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
>
> Julian Calaby
>
> Email: julian.calaby@...il.com
> Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/
> .Plan: http://sites.google.com/site/juliancalaby/
yeah.. I agree, its just people have said that I should individually
send each patch to each maintainer subsystem etc...
(rather would just send one with everything on it, but then might make
things more confusing)
Justin P. Mattock
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists