linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 18/21]include:net:mac80211.h remove one to many l's in the word.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTi=FuD0FCTv6f0sPKkg14O9R_giKi9uvA0Xsgy1q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 25 Feb 2011 17:20:49 +1100
From:	Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>
To:	"Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@...il.com>
Cc:	trivial@...nel.org, johannes@...solutions.net, davem@...emloft.net,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/21]include:net:mac80211.h remove one to many l's in the word.

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 17:15, Justin P. Mattock
<justinmattock@...il.com> wrote:
> The patch below removes an extra "l" in the word.

Random thought:

Not that I'm complaining about your work here, and not that commits
are a finite resource, but would it be possible for you to collect
your spelling changes into slightly bigger commits before sending them
off?

E.g. instead of sending off 21 patches to remove 21 erroneous l's, why
not do a full spelling check on these 21 files, then send off 21
patches to fix *all* the spelling mistakes in each file? You could
even group them up by directory if you liked.

Thanks,

-- 

Julian Calaby

Email: julian.calaby@...il.com
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/
.Plan: http://sites.google.com/site/juliancalaby/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/