linux-kernel - Re: [CFS Bandwidth Control v4 5/7] sched: add exports tracking cfs bandwidth control statistics

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1298624064.2428.1311.camel@twins>
Date:	Fri, 25 Feb 2011 09:54:24 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>,
	Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
	Herbert Poetzl <herbert@...hfloor.at>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
	Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>,
	Nikhil Rao <ncrao@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [CFS Bandwidth Control v4 5/7] sched: add exports tracking cfs
 bandwidth control statistics

On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 19:26 -0800, Paul Turner wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 5:32 AM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 19:18 -0800, Paul Turner wrote:
> >> +       raw_spin_lock(&cfs_b->lock);
> >> +       cfs_b->throttled_time += (rq->clock - cfs_rq->throttled_timestamp);
> >> +       raw_spin_unlock(&cfs_b->lock);
> >
> > That seems to put the cost of things on the wrong side. Read is rare,
> > update is frequent, and you made the frequent thing the most expensive
> > one.
> 
> Hum.. the trade-off here is non-trivial I think
> 
> - This update is only once per-quota period (*if* we throttled within
> that period).  This places the frequency in the 10s-100s of ms range.
> - Sampling would probably occur on an order of once a second (assuming
> some enterprise management system that cares about these statistics).

Ugh,. people are really polling state like that? If the event is rare
pushing state is much saner.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/