[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1298636248.2428.1722.camel@twins>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 13:17:28 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>,
Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Herbert Poetzl <herbert@...hfloor.at>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>
Subject: Re: [CFS Bandwidth Control v4 6/7] sched: hierarchical task
accounting for SCHED_OTHER
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 19:25 -0800, Paul Turner wrote:
>
> Yeah I agree :) -- I was planning on fixing this in a follow-up
> [honest!] as it's not as important since it doesn't affect idle
> balancing to the same magnitude. I wanted to first air the notion of
> hierarchal task accounting in one of the schedulers then mirror the
> support across the other schedulers with consensus reached.
Right, I think I once argued against this, but the effect on a lot of
things are against me, so lets do this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists