[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinLv=oy5_nPdziV6gpG-BLedsrNF0ew4Wz3x690@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 11:59:23 -0800
From: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Yanmin Zhang <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
"Luck,Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>, PaulMundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/17] arm: mmu_gather rework
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> Grmbl.. so doing that would require flush_tlb_range() to take an mm, not
> a vma, but tile and arm both use the vma->flags & VM_EXEC test to avoid
> flushing their i-tlbs.
>
> I'm tempted to make them flush i-tlbs unconditionally as its still
> better than hitting an mm wide tlb flush due to the page table free.
>
> Ideas?
What's wrong with using vma->vm_mm?
Hugh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists