[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110225195810.GB8860@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 11:58:10 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com>,
Olof Johansson <olofj@...omium.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Robert Lippert <rlippert@...gle.com>,
Jon Mayer <jonmayer@...gle.com>,
Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@...gle.com>,
Aaron Durbin <adurbin@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tim Hockin <thockin@...gle.com>,
David Hendrix <dhendrix@...omium.org>,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] firmware: Basic dmi-sysfs support
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 01:29:46PM -0800, Tony Luck wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com> wrote:
> > Ya, I don't think there is anything that guarantees that dmi_header is
> > aligned. The access is probably the struct copy I did here:
> >
> > /* Set the key */
> > entry->dh = *dh;
>
> Yup - looking back at the assembly I see that one of the 2-byte
> accesses is offset 2
> (picking up ->handle), but the second is offset 0 (picking up ->type
> and ->length). The
> compiler assumed the structure was 2-byte aligned because of ->handle.
>
> > What if we changed that guy to use memcpy? We'd probably need to
> > memcpy the dmi_system_event_log as well. Patch attached (applies on
> > top of the entire patchset).
>
> With the patch, all the unaligned accesses go away.
>
> Tested-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Great!
Mike, care to resend this last patch as a 6/5 patch with a proper
subject, changelog comment, and signed-off-by: section so that I can
queue it up?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists