[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110225202838.2229.71011.sendpatchset@nchumbalkar.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 20:31:55 +0000 (UTC)
From: Naga Chumbalkar <nagananda.chumbalkar@...com>
To: x86@...nel.org
Cc: Naga Chumbalkar <nagananda.chumbalkar@...com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: [PATCH]: x86: Don't check for BIOS corruption in first 64K when there's no need to
Due to commit 781c5a67f152c17c3e4a9ed9647f8c0be6ea5ae9 it is likely that
the number of areas to scan for BIOS corruption is 0 -- especially when
the first 64K is already reserved (X86_RESERVE_LOW is 64K by default).
If that's the case then don't set up the scan.
Signed-off-by: Naga Chumbalkar <nagananda.chumbalkar@...com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/check.c | 8 +++++---
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/check.c b/arch/x86/kernel/check.c
index 13a3891..a9480e1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/check.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/check.c
@@ -106,8 +106,9 @@ void __init setup_bios_corruption_check(void)
addr += size;
}
- printk(KERN_INFO "Scanning %d areas for low memory corruption\n",
- num_scan_areas);
+ if (num_scan_areas)
+ printk(KERN_INFO "Scanning %d areas for low memory "
+ "corruption\n", num_scan_areas);
}
@@ -148,7 +149,8 @@ static void check_corruption(struct work_struct *dummy)
static int start_periodic_check_for_corruption(void)
{
- if (!memory_corruption_check || corruption_check_period == 0)
+ if (!num_scan_areas || !memory_corruption_check ||
+ corruption_check_period == 0)
return 0;
printk(KERN_INFO "Scanning for low memory corruption every %d seconds\n",
--
1.7.1.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists