[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110225060815.GB15723@amit-x200.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 11:38:15 +0530
From: Amit Shah <amit.shah@...hat.com>
To: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
Cc: virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Can't build in the virtio console driver on x86_64 when the
other virtio drivers are modular
On (Thu) 24 Feb 2011 [11:28:19], Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> The virtio configuration options are inconsistent. According to this,
> every options that needs virtio will select it:
>
> # Virtio always gets selected by whoever wants it.
> config VIRTIO
> tristate
>
> Note that it's not user-selectable, so any config file that tries to
> set it will be ignored when kconfig loads those options. And yet we
> have a whole set of options that depend on VIRTIO, like VIRTIO_CONSOLE
> for example. This makes it impossible to have VIRTIO_PCI modular and
> VIRTIO_CONSOLE built-in on x86_64, because:
Any reason to have VIRTIO_PCI modular instead of built in (on x86-64,
virtio-console won't work without virtio-pci anyway)?
Amit
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists