linux-kernel - Re: ANNOUNCE: debloat-testing kernel git tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 27 Feb 2011 16:38:17 +0100
From:	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...glemail.com>
To:	Dave Täht <d@...t.net>
Cc:	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
	bloat-devel@...ts.bufferbloat.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: debloat-testing kernel git tree

On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Dave Täht <d@...t.net> wrote:
>
> Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...glemail.com> writes:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 11:22 PM, John W. Linville
>> <linville@...driver.com> wrote:
>>> Announcement
>>>
>>> The bufferbloat project [1] is pleased to announce the availability
>>> of the debloat-testing Linux kernel git tree:
>>>
>>>   git://git.infradead.org/debloat-testing.git
>
> ----snip----
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> it should be "localversion-debloat" in the commit-subject in [1] (not
>> "localversion-wireless") :-).  "-db" as suffix is IMHO not very
>> meaningful... Why not add simply a suffix called "-debloat"?  (Anyway,
>> I will revert this patch because I don't want to have any suffix added
>> automatically.)
>>
>> I have several other questions, but I start compiling first and test
>> this debloat kernel.
>
> Excellent. At moment I would recommend building "low latency preempt
> desktop" kernels with a high HZ value (400 or 1000), enabling highres
> timers, and compiling in SFB as a module. (I'd like the default for SFB
> to be "m" rather than "n", too)
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> - Sedat -
>>
>> [1] "Add localversion-wireless to identify builds from this tree."
>> http://git.infradead.org/debloat-testing.git/commit/3f9bdb4f44b076feda72d353d8ad717831416f36
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bloat-devel mailing list
>> Bloat-devel@...ts.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat-devel
>
> --
> Dave Taht
> http://nex-6.taht.net
>

These "debloat guys" are fast :-).
I was just preparing my build-system (which I normally use to
debianize linux-next kernels).
Any other recommendation for kernel-config options?
For example:
linux-next has already CONFIG_NET_SCH_CHOKE (but I have unset it).
Which commits are in debloat-testing GIT but not in linux-next tree?
Are you planning debloat feature for 2.6.39?

- Sedat -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/