[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110228155612.GA18401@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 16:56:12 +0100
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jaxboe@...ionio.com,
stable@...nel.org, dk@...telegence.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-thrttole: Do not use kblockd workqueue for throtl
work
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:51:45AM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> o Dominik Klein reported a system hang issue while doing some blkio throttling
> testing.
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/24/173
>
> o Some tracing revealed that CFQ was not dispatching any more jobs as queue
> unplug was not happening. And queue unplug was not happening because unplug
> work was not being called as there was one throttling work on same cpu
> which as not finished yet. And throttling work had not finished as it
> was tyring to dispatch a bio to CFQ but all the request descriptors were
> consume to it was put to sleep.
>
> o So basically it is a cyclic dependecny between CFQ unplug work and throtl
> dispatch work. Tejun suggested that use separate workqueue for such cases.
>
> o This patch uses a separate workqueue for throttle related work and does not
> rely on kblockd workqueue anymore.
>
> Cc: stable@...nel.org
> Reported-by: Dominik Klein <dk@...telegence.net>
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists