[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D6BDC18.7020205@fusionio.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:32:08 -0500
From: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"stable@...nel.org" <stable@...nel.org>,
"dk@...telegence.net" <dk@...telegence.net>,
"tj@...nel.org" <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-thrttole: Do not use kblockd workqueue for throtl
work
On 2011-02-28 10:51, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> o Dominik Klein reported a system hang issue while doing some blkio throttling
> testing.
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/24/173
>
> o Some tracing revealed that CFQ was not dispatching any more jobs as queue
> unplug was not happening. And queue unplug was not happening because unplug
> work was not being called as there was one throttling work on same cpu
> which as not finished yet. And throttling work had not finished as it
> was tyring to dispatch a bio to CFQ but all the request descriptors were
> consume to it was put to sleep.
>
> o So basically it is a cyclic dependecny between CFQ unplug work and throtl
> dispatch work. Tejun suggested that use separate workqueue for such cases..
>
> o This patch uses a separate workqueue for throttle related work and does not
> rely on kblockd workqueue anymore.
Not good, that's definitely a bug. I'll queue this up for 2.6.38.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists