[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110301141024.GA9014@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 22:10:30 +0800
From: Harry Wei <jiaweiwei.xiyou@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: joe@...ches.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/18] MAINTAINERS: Remove unnecessary
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org entries
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 11:20:38AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 09:41:58PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > CC'ing lkml is the default and doesn't need separate entries.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
>
> I've run into a noticable number of issues with users not parsing this
> convention as expected and sending only direct to maintainer mail for
> things that have no list. For the amount of space it saves in the file
> I'm not sure it's worth removing such entries.
Hi Mark,
I agree with Joe. I think any patch about kernel should be emailed to LKML and other connection ML, as well as maintainers.
Thanks.
Best Regards.
Harry Wei.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists