linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/18] MAINTAINERS: Remove unnecessary linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org entries

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110301141308.GG9662@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date:	Tue, 1 Mar 2011 14:13:08 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	joe@...ches.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/18] MAINTAINERS: Remove unnecessary
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org entries

On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 10:10:30PM +0800, Harry Wei wrote:

Please fix your MUA to word wrap within paragraphs.

>      I agree with Joe. I think any patch about kernel should be
>      emailed to LKML and other connection ML, as well as maintainers.

You're missing my point.  My point is that removing references to LKML
from MAINTAINERS is working against this as it makes it harder for users
to work out that they're supposed to do this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/