[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110301144712.GA9798@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 22:47:15 +0800
From: Harry Wei <jiaweiwei.xiyou@...il.com>
To: broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com
Cc: joe@...ches.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: [PATCH 05/18] MAINTAINERS: Remove unnecessary
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org entries
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 10:43:03PM +0800, jiaweiwei wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> Date: 2011/3/1
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/18] MAINTAINERS: Remove unnecessary
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org entries
> To: joe@...ches.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 10:10:30PM +0800, Harry Wei wrote:
>
> Please fix your MUA to word wrap within paragraphs.
I am so sorry, i will do.
>
> > I agree with Joe. I think any patch about kernel should be
> > emailed to LKML and other connection ML, as well as maintainers.
>
> You're missing my point. My point is that removing references to LKML
> from MAINTAINERS is working against this as it makes it harder for users
> to work out that they're supposed to do this.
Maybe you are right.
Thanks.
Best Regards.
Harry Wei.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
>
> --
> do kernel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists