linux-kernel - Re: Fwd: [PATCH 05/18] MAINTAINERS: Remove unnecessary linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org entries

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110308194538.GA8002@home.goodmis.org>
Date:	Tue, 8 Mar 2011 14:45:38 -0500
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, joe@...ches.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: [PATCH 05/18] MAINTAINERS: Remove unnecessary
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org entries

On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 10:47:15PM +0800, Harry Wei wrote:
> > 
> > >      I agree with Joe. I think any patch about kernel should be
> > >      emailed to LKML and other connection ML, as well as maintainers.
> > 
> > You're missing my point.  My point is that removing references to LKML
> > from MAINTAINERS is working against this as it makes it harder for users
> > to work out that they're supposed to do this.
> Maybe you are right.

Perhaps we should just add at the beginning of MAINTAINERS a note that
says something to the effect: "When in doubt, Cc
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org". And then remove all individual references
to the list.

-- Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/