[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110310020718.GA2976@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 10:07:21 +0800
From: Harry Wei <jiaweiwei.xiyou@...il.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, joe@...ches.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: [PATCH 05/18] MAINTAINERS: Remove unnecessary
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org entries
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 02:45:38PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 10:47:15PM +0800, Harry Wei wrote:
> > >
> > > > I agree with Joe. I think any patch about kernel should be
> > > > emailed to LKML and other connection ML, as well as maintainers.
> > >
> > > You're missing my point. My point is that removing references to LKML
> > > from MAINTAINERS is working against this as it makes it harder for users
> > > to work out that they're supposed to do this.
> > Maybe you are right.
>
> Perhaps we should just add at the beginning of MAINTAINERS a note that
> says something to the effect: "When in doubt, Cc
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org". And then remove all individual references
> to the list.
This sounds good. I think we should have a try.
Could i patch for this thought?
Any different idea for us?
Thanks.
Best Regards.
Harry Wei.
>
> -- Steve
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists