[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikt1r3j99_ub0ce3_3snjoDXvR2+x6RxcjGfMK8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 21:01:50 +0100
From: Pierre Tardy <tardyp@...il.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [RFC, PATCHv3 3/3] mmc: sdhci: handle wake-up from runtime_pm
>> + if (pm_runtime_suspended()) {
>> + host->waking_up = 1;
>> + /* Note that we disable temporarly the interrupt until we do the
>> + * resume. If we don't then we'll get constantly interrupted
>> + * until we actually resume.
>> + *
>> + * as the irq is shared, this might not be very friendly to our
>> + * irq sharers but the pm_runtime workqueue should really be
>> + * called soon.
>
> Instead of disabling the IRQ, would it be possible to tell the device
> to stop generating an interrupt request?
Well, the device is power gated, so any access to it will cause a bus
timeout (depending of the platform)
>> + */
>> + disable_irq_nosync(irq);
>> + pm_runtime_get(host->mmc->parent);
>
> Does this pm_runtime_get() have a corresponding pm_runtime_put()? I
> didn't notice one anywhere.
oups, forgot to add the corresponding snippet in sdhci_runtime_resume:
if (host->waking_up) {
pm_runtime_put();
host->waking_up = 0;
}
>>
>
> Surely this doesn't belong in the patch.
yep sorry, I should stop doing git commit -a...
Pierre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists