linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V6 2/2] tracing, perf: add cpu hotplug trace events

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTikzfNsB=9jQSYrWDEYd3Kd1-d8cVMO79ZqDNt4n@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 2 Mar 2011 10:50:29 +0100
From:	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hotplug@...r.kernel.org,
	fweisbec@...il.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, amit.kucheria@...aro.org,
	mingo@...e.hu, rusty@...tcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 2/2] tracing, perf: add cpu hotplug trace events

On 2 March 2011 10:38, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Mar 2011, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>
>> Trace the cpu state and the time spent in core and arch code
>
> So you completely ignored my review comments, except for fixing up the
> changelog.
>
>        https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/24/297
>
> All of the comments in the code still apply and either you fix it or
> at least have the courtesy to explain why you think that those
> comments do not need to be addressed.
>

I thought that I have answered to your comments :
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/28/203

Do I miss something ?

Thanks,

Vincent
> Thanks,
>
>        tglx
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/