linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V6 2/2] tracing, perf: add cpu hotplug trace events

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1103021053480.2701@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date:	Wed, 2 Mar 2011 10:55:11 +0100 (CET)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hotplug@...r.kernel.org,
	fweisbec@...il.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, amit.kucheria@...aro.org,
	mingo@...e.hu, rusty@...tcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 2/2] tracing, perf: add cpu hotplug trace events

On Wed, 2 Mar 2011, Vincent Guittot wrote:

> On 2 March 2011 10:38, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 Mar 2011, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> >
> >> Trace the cpu state and the time spent in core and arch code
> >
> > So you completely ignored my review comments, except for fixing up the
> > changelog.
> >
> >        https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/24/297
> >
> > All of the comments in the code still apply and either you fix it or
> > at least have the courtesy to explain why you think that those
> > comments do not need to be addressed.
> >
> 
> I thought that I have answered to your comments :
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/28/203
> 
> Do I miss something ?

Oops, my bad. I missed that reply somehow. It's not in my inbox. Will
dig into my lkml archive then.

Thanks,

	tglx