linux-kernel - RFC: x86: kill binutils 2.16.x?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4D6E8932.1010405@zytor.com>
Date:	Wed, 02 Mar 2011 10:15:14 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: RFC: x86: kill binutils 2.16.x?

binutils 2.16 (and presumably its prereleases, binutils 2.15.9x) appears
to have more bugs than any other version of binutils released in modern
history, *before or after*.

We chronically run into problems because that particular binutils
version breaks code that works fine elsewhere.

I would like to know who would suffer from formally discontinuing
support for that version.  I understand some version of SLES shipped it,
but I don't know for sure.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/