linux-kernel - Re: RFC: x86: kill binutils 2.16.x?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20110302120339.efd60504.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 2 Mar 2011 12:03:39 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: RFC: x86: kill binutils 2.16.x?

On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 10:15:14 -0800
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> wrote:

> binutils 2.16 (and presumably its prereleases, binutils 2.15.9x) appears
> to have more bugs than any other version of binutils released in modern
> history, *before or after*.
> 
> We chronically run into problems because that particular binutils
> version breaks code that works fine elsewhere.
> 
> I would like to know who would suffer from formally discontinuing
> support for that version.  I understand some version of SLES shipped it,
> but I don't know for sure.
> 

I gave up and became a customer of
http://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/index_old.shtml
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/