[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D6EA473.9000001@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 12:11:31 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: x86: kill binutils 2.16.x?
On 03/02/2011 12:03 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 10:15:14 -0800
> "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>
>> binutils 2.16 (and presumably its prereleases, binutils 2.15.9x) appears
>> to have more bugs than any other version of binutils released in modern
>> history, *before or after*.
>>
>> We chronically run into problems because that particular binutils
>> version breaks code that works fine elsewhere.
>>
>> I would like to know who would suffer from formally discontinuing
>> support for that version. I understand some version of SLES shipped it,
>> but I don't know for sure.
>>
>
> I gave up and became a customer of
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/index_old.shtml
Vegard,
The source directory in the above doesn't seem to match the binary
directories, and is stuck at binutils 2.16.1. At the very best this is
iffy from a GPL perspective, and very confusing to users.
This is obviously a highly useful project, can we straighten out the
source situation?
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists