linux-kernel - Re: ANNOUNCE: debloat-testing kernel git tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1299176168.2157.14.camel@tardy>
Date:	Thu, 03 Mar 2011 10:16:08 -0800
From:	Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To:	Dave Täht <d@...t.net>
Cc:	sedat.dilek@...il.com, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, bloat-devel@...ts.bufferbloat.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: debloat-testing kernel git tree

> For wireless routers and cable home gateways especially, this research
> shows that the total un-managed buffers in your system should be less
> than 32.

Would it be a good thing to start describing these queues not so much in
terms of packets but in terms of delay (or bandwidth X delay)?

Constants tend to live longer than they should, no matter how noble in
birth.

rick jones

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/