linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] ptp: add a software clock based on clock_monotonic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110304161018.GA4527@riccoc20.at.omicron.at>
Date:	Fri, 4 Mar 2011 17:10:18 +0100
From:	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, richard.cochran@...cron.at,
	johnstul@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ptp: add a software clock based on
 clock_monotonic_raw

On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 12:30:32PM +0100, torbenh wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 07:42:51AM +0100, Richard Cochran wrote:
> > 
> > Better yet, why not just use the V6 example instead?  If we are going
> > to have a testing driver, then I would want the simulated ancillary
> > code as well.
> 
> well... your example code messes with clock_realtime.

But could you take the file and replace the CLOCK_REALTIME code with
your SW implemented offset/frequency corrections?

And, just keep my code for simulating the ancillary stuff as is.

> i was planning to emit real timed events, not just some simulation.
> but i dont completely understand this part of the code yet.

??? (None of my PHC patches implement any user timers.)

I am not sure where you are going with the AVB clock idea, but it will
be fun to find out.

Thanks,

Richard

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/