[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1299355687.28285.130.camel@work-vm>
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2011 12:08:07 -0800
From: john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Cc: Torben Hohn <torbenh@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
richard.cochran@...cron.at, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ptp: add a software clock based on
clock_monotonic_raw
On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 07:46 +0100, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 11:34:04AM -0800, john stultz wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 18:26 +0100, Torben Hohn wrote:
> > > First version of a software clock. Not very useful yet,
> > > as it doesnt generate events, but at least it allows
> > > for testing the ptp framework without special hardware.
> >
> > So in the past, I pushed back on Richard for having something similar,
> > as I'm not psyched about duplicating interfaces. However, your
> > implementation is CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW instead of CLOCK_REALTIME and it
> > keeps the adjustments internal, I'm not as opposed.
>
> (Aha! So it is okay after all ;)
>
> I do think a software only PHC will make it easier for people to get
> started with the new interface. I have been carrying along such a
> patch privately for my own testing.
Consistency is but a hobgoblin... :)
But seriously, do forgive me if I misunderstood your earlier patches
with this respect. I thought it was just exporting CLOCK_REALTIME
directly through a new interface/clockid (which would be duplicative).
thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists