[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201103042148.39944.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 21:48:39 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Kees Cook <kees.cook@...onical.com>
Cc: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, security@...nel.org,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] power: disable hibernation if module loading is disabled
On Friday, March 04, 2011, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 07:11:24PM +0300, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> > If /proc/sys/kernel/modules_disabled is set to 1, then nobody (even full
> > root) may not read/write arbitrary kernel memory. In spite of it,
> > hibernation allows anyone with an access to either /dev/snapshot or
> > /sys/power/ make the full snapshot of the system. This snapshot may be
> > freely changed and uploaded back.
>
> Ah, yes please. I'd like to try to have ways to close all the
> "intentional" arbitrary memory writing interfaces.
They are not exactly arbitrary and I'd like to see a plausible attack
scenario using the hibernation interface as is (assuming you're not a
full root at least).
> Hooking it to modules_disable seems as good as any other toggle.
You're kidding, aren't you?
> Still waiting to hear
> anything on this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.acpi.devel/49471
I personally don't think it's a good idea, but I'm not the maintainer of that
code.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists