[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110304211035.GA28842@albatros>
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 00:10:35 +0300
From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, security@...nel.org,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] power: disable hibernation if module loading is
disabled
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 21:42 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> That "everyone" is actually the "full root" (in the case of /sys/power/state)
> or someone having CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the /dev/snapshot case, right?
Yes, sorry for my bad english. "Everyone" is indeed misleading :-D
> Second, there's _zero_ relationship between /proc/sys/kernel/modules_disabled
> and the hibernation interface, so please find a different way to solve the
> problem (if there is any).
If modules_disabled is set to 1, then nobody, even full root may not write
to the kernel, right? So, if something permits to indirectly pass
modules_disabled restriction, this is a bug. Otherwise,
modules_disabled is confusing as it gives false sense of security.
-OR-
modules_disabled's documentation should be changed to note that it
doesn't prevent rootkit uploading, but only forbids modprob'ing modules
via the "official" init_module(2) gate, disallowing e.g. module autoloading.
Thanks,
--
Vasiliy Kulikov
http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists