[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1103041332001.3762@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:33:29 -0800 (PST)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
tglx@...utronix.de, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH x86/mm] x86-64, NUMA: Don't assume phys node 0 is always
online in numa_emulation() handling
On Fri, 4 Mar 2011, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Undetermined entries in emu_nid_to_phys[] are filled with zero
> assuming that physical node 0 is always online; however, this might
> not be true depending on hardware configuration. Find a physical node
> which is actually online and use it instead.
>
I still don't understand why emu_nid_to_phys[] can't return NUMA_NO_NODE
and this needs to be done at all. An emulated node should be mapped to a
physical node based on the address ranges of that emulated node, so it's
impossible for that to not map directly to a physical online node. We
don't support memoryless emulated nodes for hotpluggable SRAT entries.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists